Re: We have a requirement to downgrade from PostgreSQL 9.5.4 to 9.5.2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: We have a requirement to downgrade from PostgreSQL 9.5.4 to 9.5.2
Date
Msg-id 0118f944-7b19-9438-1668-bceafafd21e7@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: We have a requirement to downgrade from PostgreSQL 9.5.4 to 9.5.2  (Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>)
List pgsql-general
On 09/19/2016 09:43 PM, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
> It is binary compatible, so yes. But trust me, there is problem with the
> new version.

Just to be clear did you mean:

"But trust me, there is problem with the new version."

Or

But trust me, there is no problem with the new version.

>
> On 20 September 2016 06:00:59 CEST, KGA Official
> <kga.official@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Hi All,
>
>     We are currently running at 9.5.2 and plan to upgrade to 9.5.4, but
>     our change requirement needs to plan for a downgrade with data
>     preservation, before upgrade is authorized.
>
>     Thus, I am asking this: Is it safe to downgrade from 9.5.4 to 9.5.2
>     by simply replacing the binaries? We will keep the data folder same.
>
>     Thx!
>
>
> --
> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail
> gesendet.


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Patrick B
Date:
Subject: Re: FATAL: could not receive data from WAL stream
Next
From: Venkata B Nagothi
Date:
Subject: Re: We have a requirement to downgrade from PostgreSQL 9.5.4 to 9.5.2