Re: 7.1.2 packaging - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: 7.1.2 packaging
Date
Msg-id 01060411075002.00912@lowen.wgcr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7.1.2 packaging  (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød))
Responses Re: 7.1.2 packaging  (teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød))
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 04 June 2001 10:56, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes:
> > On Sunday 03 June 2001 13:05, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > > "Tim Mickol" <tmickol@combimatrix.com> writes:
> > > > any word on 7.1.2 in RPM or SRPM form?
> > > An SRPM can be found at http://people.redhat.com/teg/pg/

> > NOTE:
> > While Trond's SRPM is very good (and will be used for pieces in the PGDG
> > SRPM release), do note that Trond's scripts and spec file both use
> > features of latest RedHat releases, which my RPM's may or may not use.

> There shouldn't bee much there which is Red Hat specific...
> There is comments on the top of the file which break some early
> versions of rpm v3 (newer versions of RPM should be run on all
> supported versions of Red Hat Linux anyway). Other than that,
> reference to Red Hat specific files (like /etc/sysconfig/i18n) are
> conditional.

In the initscript the use of gettext()?  The use of the Red Hat init
functions success and kin?  (I _know_ some versions of TurboLinux don't
support those functions -- yet the RPM will build and run successfully on
TurboLinux otherwise.)

At one point the spec file wouldn't build to completion on Red Hat 6.1 --
which, at the time, I was supporting, due to the use of a libtool fileset
that didn't exist in 6.1. While I know, understand, and agree that you don't
need to support older Red Hat releases in the RPMset, I feel rather strongly
that the 'generic' RPMset should support as many RPM-based platforms as is
possible -- that is, if PostgreSQL builds and runs, then the RPMset should
build and run.  At least that is my goal -- which means I may very well have
cruft in there that the latest RPM fixes -- and I may have to deal with older
RPM versions.  This is one area our goals differ -- and that's OK.

If I still had a development platform running Red Hat 5.2, I'd be making sure
that is built there as well.
- --
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7G6RJ5kGGI8vV9eERAtUQAJ47SI1H+S/uHi2jVpgHmBGnbiU1vwCfZBUO
SwV+MfpI+aux+cm960bZA84=
=pUZo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jim Mercer
Date:
Subject: template1, can there be a template2/3/4?
Next
From: "Daniel A. Melo"
Date:
Subject: problem with Timestamp