Re: More on elog and error codes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Sawtell
Subject Re: More on elog and error codes
Date
Msg-id 01032109414401.09393@berty
Whole thread Raw
In response to More on elog and error codes  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: More on elog and error codes  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
Re: More on elog and error codes  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:56, you wrote:
> I've looked at the elog calls in the source, about 1700 in total (only

[ ... ]

> So we need some good error numbering scheme.  Any ideas?

Just that it might be a good idea to incorporate the  version / release 
details in some way so that when somebody on the list is squeaking about 
an error message it is obvious to the helper that the advice needed is to 
upgrade from the Cretatious Period version to a modern release, and have 
another go.

-- 
Sincerely etc.,
NAME       Christopher SawtellCELL PHONE 021 257 4451ICQ UIN    45863470EMAIL      csawtell @ xtra . co . nzCNOTES
ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/languages/C/tutorials/sawtell_C.tar.gz
-->> Please refrain from using HTML or WORD attachments in e-mails to me 
<<--



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Ansley
Date:
Subject: RE: Final Call: RC1 about to go out the door ...
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0.