On 19/10/2025 21:43, Rich Shepard wrote:
> In the former book I read that sometimes it's better to have multiple
> values
> for an atribute in a single row by creating a separate table for that
> attribute rather than using the postgres array capability. The people
> table
> in my database (1706 rows) has two attributes using the array type
> (direct_phone and email), and only a few indivuals have multiple landline
> phone numbers (cell_phone is a separate column) or email addresses
> (office
> and personal?). Would it make sense for me to create new landline and
> email
> address tables and replace the array contents?
>
My experience of doing something similar was that arrays work very well
for the use-case you describe, as long as you don't have to search
inside the arrays... I found that, if you have to search for a specific
value inside an array, then performance really goes out the window. Mind
you, clever use of an index would probably help here.
Ray.
--
Ray O'Donnell // Galway // Ireland
ray@rodonnell.ie
