Re: Recent backward compatibility break in PreparedStatement.setObject() - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc
From | Markus KARG |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Recent backward compatibility break in PreparedStatement.setObject() |
Date | |
Msg-id | 00f801d143d5$0afa0eb0$20ee2c10$@eu Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Recent backward compatibility break in PreparedStatement.setObject() (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
List | pgsql-jdbc |
Never mind. :-)
-Markus
From: davecramer@gmail.com [mailto:davecramer@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Dave Cramer
Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Dezember 2015 14:25
To: Markus KARG
Cc: List
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Recent backward compatibility break in PreparedStatement.setObject()
Apologies, you are correct I should have announced it.
Dave Cramer
davec@postgresintl.com
On 31 December 2015 at 07:53, Markus KARG <markus@headcrashing.eu> wrote:
Thanks, but as I also developed the fix as announced this morning, I now spent time for nothing! Would be good if also the project lead *first* files a bug report and assigns to itself. :-(
From: davecramer@gmail.com [mailto:davecramer@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Dave Cramer
Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Dezember 2015 12:32
To: Markus KARG
Cc: Adam Rauch; List
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Recent backward compatibility break in PreparedStatement.setObject()
I put a PR in already https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/480
Dave Cramer
davec@postgresintl.com
On 31 December 2015 at 03:23, Markus KARG <markus@headcrashing.eu> wrote:
I'm the original contributor of that changeset. This is simply a bug. I'll fix it later today. Thanks for reporting! :-)
-Markus
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Dave Cramer
Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Dezember 2015 22:55
To: Adam Rauch
Cc: List
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Recent backward compatibility break in PreparedStatement.setObject()
No, this was not intentional.
Thanks for the report!
Dave Cramer
davec@postgresintl.com
On 30 December 2015 at 16:45, Adam Rauch <adam@labkey.com> wrote:
The PostgreSQL JDBC driver recently changed PreparedStatement behavior with calls such as setObject(index, value, Types.VARCHAR). Previously, the driver would call value.toString() before binding all VARCHAR values... meaning any object could be passed as "value." In recent updates (e.g., 9.4.1207), most non-String values now result in an exception:
Exception in thread "main" org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: Cannot convert an instance of XXX to type String
at org.postgresql.jdbc.PgStatement.cannotCastException(PgStatement.java:1813)
at org.postgresql.jdbc.PgStatement.cannotCastException(PgStatement.java:1809)
at org.postgresql.jdbc.PgStatement.castToString(PgStatement.java:1805)
at org.postgresql.jdbc.PgStatement.setObject(PgStatement.java:1540)
at org.postgresql.jdbc.PgStatement.setObject(PgStatement.java:1818)
at PGTest.main(PGTest.java:25)
This seems to have broken during the refactor to support binary transfer for setObject(), https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/issues/328. Was the behavior change intentional? If so, it should probably be documented (e.g., I didn't see any mention in the change log). If not, I'd suggest going back to calling value.toString() for all types. I'm sure ours is not the only application that relies on this long-standing (>10 years) PostgreSQL JDBC behavior. FWIW, other JDBC drivers call toString() in this situation.
Here's a contrived example that demonstrates the behavior change. This code snippet runs fine in 1201 but fails with the exception above in 1207.
Object param = new Object() {public String toString() {return "tables";}};
try (PreparedStatement stmt = conn.prepareStatement("SELECT * FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_name = ?"))
{
stmt.setObject(1, param, Types.VARCHAR);
try (ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery())
{
while (rs.next())
System.out.println(rs.getString(1));
}
}
Thanks,
Adam
pgsql-jdbc by date: