----- Original Message -----
> No. The rule
>
> CREATE RULE newsrule AS ON INSERT TO news
> WHERE new.publishtime NOTNULL DO
> INSERT INTO news_unpublished VALUES (new.id);
>
> should do the job perfectly. Maybe you want to have the
> following rules too:
The following happens:
rules=# insert into news (title, time) values('Hei', now());
ERROR: <unnamed> referential integrity violation - key referenced from
news_unpublished not found in news
Seems the data is inserted into news_unpublished first, thereby violating
the constraint I have defined for the news_id field (see below). After
removing the constraint a second problem arose; the id created for news
(serial) was 4, while the id inserted into news_unpublished was 3. So far a
trigger procedure seems to be the best solution.
> CREATE RULE newsrule4 AS ON DELETE TO news
> WHERE old.publishtime NOTNULL DO
> DELETE FROM news_unpublished WHERE news_unpublished.id =
old.id;
This is also achieved by the following right? (id is the primary key for
news):
create table news_unpublished ( news_id int references news on delete cascade
);
André Næss
