Sorry - the post that showed up this morning was old - I think it got
stalled by the software that manages the list. When I saw that it didn't
show up after I posted it, I reposted , and got a bunch of answers, and then
out of the blue my stalled post re-appears.
Thanks for the answers - there was some new info in there (so you didn't
waste your time).
David
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Castle" <dalgoda@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: local.ml.postgresql.general
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Work Around for Oracle Context Indexes?
> In article <200202181429.g1IETjP12439@candle.pha.pa.us>,
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> >Sure, see /contrib/fulltextindex.
>
>
> Is this bit from README.fti still true:
>
> (this can also be done by using subselects - but subselects are currently
> inefficient in Postgres, and maybe there're other ways too).
>
> If not, would it be better to use joins or sub-selects?
>
> mrc
> --
> Mike Castle dalgoda@ix.netcom.com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
> We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
> fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); --
gcc
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
