Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)
Date
Msg-id 00d301c381bf$c8a5c6b0$3d283ddb@PbgX
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
Responses Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)  (Gaetano Mendola <mendola@bigfoot.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gaetano Mendola [mailto:mendola@bigfoot.com] 
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > instead. Because it was impossible to make REINDEX transaction-safe
> > then, such flag was needed to suppress inconsistency as less
> > as possible.
> 
> This mean that the actual REINDEX is not transaction-safe ?

No.
It was not transaction-safe long time ago.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gaetano Mendola
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long)
Next
From: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Date:
Subject: free(3)-ing variables in pg_dump