Re: Recomended FS - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ben-Nes Michael
Subject Re: Recomended FS
Date
Msg-id 00c501c3970b$6900f250$0500a8c0@canaan.co.il
Whole thread Raw
In response to Recomended FS  ("Ben-Nes Michael" <miki@canaan.co.il>)
List pgsql-general
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
To: "Ben-Nes Michael" <miki@canaan.co.il>
Cc: "Nick Burrett" <nick@dsvr.net>; "postgresql"
<pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Recomended FS


> Ben-Nes Michael wrote:
>
> >>I'm saying: don't expect your DB performance to come on leaps and bounds
> >>just because you changed to a different filesystem format.  If you've
> >>got speed problems then it might help to look elsewhere first.
> >>
> >
> > I dont expect miracles :)
> > but still i have to choose one,so why shouldnt i choose the one which
best
> > fit ?
>
> All things being equal, you should optimise your application design and
database
> tuning before you choose file system.
>
> If a thing works well for you, with a better file system it will just work
> better. That's the point.
>

I agree, but still ill have to choose an FS, does the list have any opinion
on what FS to choose ?

>   Shridhar
>
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Shridhar Daithankar
Date:
Subject: Re: Recomended FS
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ShmemAlloc errors