Hi, James.
I'm a member of pg_bulkload developer community.
Thank you for the bug report.
Sorry to become late...
We have released the new version of pg_bulkload , 3.1.3 where the reported
bug is fixed.
I hope this new version will help you.
Regards.
++++++++++++
Takashi Ohnishi <onishi_takashi_d5@lab.ntt.co.jp>
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Fujii Masao
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 11:51 PM
To: Tom Lane
Cc: James Cowell; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [Solved] Corrupt indexes on slave when using
pg_bulkload on master
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> James Cowell <jcowell@btinternet.com> writes:
>> But pg_bulkload only puts the index updates into WAL if you also have
>>
>> archive_mode = on
>>
>> I guess it needs to test wal_level rather than archive mode now? It
looks like changes to the project have been minimal for some time, which is
a shame because it's a very useful tool.
>
> Oh, the code in question is in pg_bulkload not the backend? Yeah, it
> sounds like it hasn't tracked some core-code changes. In particular
> you might point the author at
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=40f9
> 08bdcdc726fc11912cd95dfd2f89603d1f37#patch10
> which shows how it needs to be done in 9.0 and later.
I reported this problem to the author in offlist. Thanks for the bug report!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
