Re: a tiny question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
Subject Re: a tiny question
Date
Msg-id 00ba01c284e5$437e19b0$cab990c1@atc.unican.es
Whole thread Raw
In response to a tiny question  ("Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro" <lamigo@atc.unican.es>)
List pgsql-hackers
a guess it's said inter-locking, I mean data accessed exclusively.
I apologize for my english


----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com>
To: "Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro" <lamigo@atc.unican.es>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] a tiny question


> "Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro" <lamigo@atc.unican.es> writes:
> > When we improve seq scans, systems scales well up to 8 cpus.When we
improve index
> > scan, query performance increase but system stops scaling at about 4
proccessors,
> > profiling shows that it is due to increased memory contention
>
> What do you mean by "memory contention"?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Is my Internet connection slow
Next
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: protocol change in 7.4