Re: question on backends - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro
Subject Re: question on backends
Date
Msg-id 00b001c236ef$321759f0$cab990c1@atc.unican.es
Whole thread Raw
In response to question on backends  ("Luis Alberto Amigo Navarro" <lamigo@atc.unican.es>)
List pgsql-hackers
How?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] question on backends

Just use persistent connections.
 
Chris
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 5:32 PM
Subject: [HACKERS] question on backends

Hi all
As I understand every time there is a request to postgres a new backend is made, and when the request is finished, even if the connection is already active the backend dies. I wonder if is there any parameter that allow backends to remain beyond a transaction. Creating a new backend every time a transaction is made means forking the code and reallocating sort_memory. Although it is not a high resource usage, on short transactions as OLTPs it is a relevant work time, I think it would be interesting that a predefined number of backends were allowed to remain active beyond the transaction.
Thanks and Regards

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne"
Date:
Subject: Re: question on backends
Next
From: Matthew Tedder
Date:
Subject: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?