Re: Licensing issues including another projects source code into the jdbc driver - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Licensing issues including another projects source code into the jdbc driver
Date
Msg-id 00af01c16634$6957d160$8201a8c0@inspiron
Whole thread Raw
In response to Licensing issues including another projects source code into the jdbc driver  ("Dave Cramer" <Dave@micro-automation.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Umm ok,

This is dissappointing; kind of defeats the purpose of being able to
leverage open source code for the good of all open source projects. It
isn't that big a deal, we can write our own logging package.

Dave 

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net] 
Sent: November 5, 2001 3:05 PM
To: Dave Cramer
Cc: 'Bruce Momjian'; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Licensing issues including another projects
source code into the jdbc driver


Dave Cramer writes:

> I presume you are referring to the 3rd clause? What is the issue with
> this clause?

It would require everyone that ships a product based on the JDBC driver
to
mention this acknowledgement in advertisements, which is annoying and
impractical.  More generally, it would introduce a divergence in
licensing
in PostgreSQL, which should be avoided.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: 7.2b2 today
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: compiler warnings in ODBC