I wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > Hmm, fair point. But I'm still not convinced that we really need to
> > add extra accounting for this. What's wrong with just reporting the
> > number of exact and lossy pages?
> No. I intended to show the desired memory space for a TIDBitmap rather
> than the peak memory usage for that TIDBitmap. And I thought it'd be
better
> for the latter to be displayed as additional information. However, I've
> removed the functionality for showing the desired memory space due to
> technical problems. Now I should probably remove the functionality for
> showing the peak memory usage too.
> Yes, as Andres mentioned, showing the peak memory usage is not a bad idea,
> I think. But I start to think it's not necessarily worth complicating the
> code ...
> If there are no objections of others, I'll remove extra accounting for
> showing the peak memory usage.
Done. Please find attached a patch.
Thanks,
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
