Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Moray McConnachie
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Date
Msg-id 00a801bf8363$4645e550$760e01a3@oucs.ox.ac.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; 'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org'
<pgsql-sql@postgreSQL.org>; PostgreSQL Development
<pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by -
returns multiplesh


> > > So are we willing to field questions from people trying to use
TEMP
> > > tables and trying TEMP and not TEMPORARY.  I realize the
restriction on
> > > a field called TEMP, but we don't get those very often.  How
many people
> > > are going to guess TEMP and not TEMPORARY?
> >
> > Well, that's one reason to stick to a published standard. No
guessing
> > required since one could look it up ;)
>
> If you survive reading the standard.  :-)

If you can even *find* the standard :->

(is there an on-line source - all links I've ever seen 404ed...?)



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Broytmann
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] PGSQL & MYSQL
Next
From: Rybarczyk Mikolaj
Date:
Subject: Outer Joins (when?)