Re: INSERT ON CONFLICT of "wide" table: target lists can have at most 1664 entries - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gmail
Subject Re: INSERT ON CONFLICT of "wide" table: target lists can have at most 1664 entries
Date
Msg-id 00F6777D-4500-4FEF-9BCE-0D1A22C1A2AB@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to INSERT ON CONFLICT of "wide" table: target lists can have at most 1664 entries  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-general
> On Dec 4, 2016, at 9:32 AM, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
>
> Our application INSERTs data from external sources, and infrequently UPDATEs
> the previously-inserted data (currently, it first SELECTs to determine whether
> to UPDATE).
>
> I'm implementing unique indices to allow "upsert" (and pg_repack and..), but
> running into a problem when the table has >830 columns (we have some tables
> which are at the 1600 column limit, and have previously worked around that
> limit using arrays or multiple tables).
>
> I tried to work around the upsert problem by using pygresql inline=True
> (instead of default PREPAREd statements) but both have the same issue.
>
> I created a test script which demonstrates the problem (attached).
>
> It seems to me that there's currently no way to "upsert" such a wide table?

Pardon my intrusion here, but I'm really curious what sort of datum has so many attributes?



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rich Shepard
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres and LibreOffice's 'Base'
Next
From: Joseph Brenner
Date:
Subject: Re: Select works only when connected from login postgres