Re: Views, indices and pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: Views, indices and pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 009101c0b696$5229e1c0$1001a8c0@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Views, indices and pg_dump  (Zak McGregor <zak@mighty.co.za>)
Responses Re: Views, indices and pg_dump
List pgsql-general
From: "Zak McGregor" <zak@mighty.co.za>

> Hi all
>
> Thanks to everyone for this great forum, and for Postgres!
>
> I have a couple of questions:
>
> I have a smallish table which I join on another (smaller) table. I have
> created a view for this purpose, thinking it would save on overhead.
> The view also incorporates some calculated fields. However, when I do an
> EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM my_view it shows sequential scans on both tables and
> no use of any indices (I've created them on the view and the two other
> tables). It seems the view does the join on the fly. If so, will using a
> view speed up queries? Also, how do I make it use the indices for queries?

OK - a view is nothing more than a pre-built query. It is useful for
ease-of-use and controlling which users can see which parts of your
database. It isn't going to gain you anything in performance.

If the EXPLAIN shows sequential scans, you'll need to look into the costs
listed for each stage of the query and how many rows PG thinks will be
returned. There are some items on explain in the performance-tips section of
the user manual, Bruce's book (link on www.postgresql.org) and in my
PostgreSQL notes (techdocs.postgresql.org)

If you want assistance with the explain please post the view definition, its
table definitions along with the explain.

> Another, slightly unrelated question: Why does pg_dump dump the view as a
> normal table?

Mine dumps as a CREATE VIEW statement - can you provide an example (with
which version of PG you are using).

HTH

- Richard Huxton


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Lohse
Date:
Subject: Re: Hi
Next
From: "Eric G. Miller"
Date:
Subject: Re: records zapped to null