Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?
Date
Msg-id 008a01c21f23$87553560$0200a8c0@SOL
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: mistake in sql99 compatibility?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sure?  I don't see it.  In fact, I only see it in the 'SQL92 features we
don't have section'.

http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-createview.html

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 2:57 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] mistake in sql99 compatibility?


> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > The cvs docs say that we support the 'WITH CHECK OPTION' on views, but
the
> > TODO says we don't...
>
> TODO updated.  Not sure when it was added but I see it in SGML docs.
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: Object Oriented Features
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Are these groups "unauthorized"?