> I believe that it is appropriate for contrib/ because it is a good demo
> of FTI-like capabilities. But nothing more, yet. For at least a couple
> of reasons:
>
> 1) It generates the "index" as a table, not a PostgreSQL index or
> index-like thing.
>
> 2) It has a hardcoded list of non-indexed words. This should come from a
> table, to allow it to be tuned to the application requirements.
>
> Comments?
>
> - Thomas
>
In general..
a) Considering that I was coding up the same thing with triggers and such,
things could only get better.
b) Check out MSSQL 7's capabilities and weep.
c) It would be a start. One its in the tree, it gets used more, gets
improved..
It would be a while yet before 7.2 starts, plenty of time then to develop
it further.
Regards
John
