I wouldn't say ditch out on Redhat because of Postgres upgrades. As was
mentioned on the list before, there is no current silver bullet upgrade for
postgres. Dump, install new version, import old data. I would assume then
that means SUSE would be no better on that regard either.
Also, any bad experiences I have had with Redhat are not with Redhat
themselves, per se. Mainly with RPMs. They really just don't mix well with
applications you compile... OK, and maybe the occasional wierd directory
structure that goes on, but other than that, I still choose them over other
distributions.
Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
----- Original Message -----
From: "os390 ibmos" <os390@hotmail.com>
To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] postgres on redhat 7.0
>
> Exactly my point. My next Linux server that I build is going
> to be SUSE, atleast some guys are not in a hurry to go public.
>
> >From: "Steve Wolfe" <steve@iboats.com>
>
>
> > Well, it certainly doesn't contradict the RedHat philosophy of "Give
> >them
> >the product for free, then charge for support." ; )
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
