Re: query_planner() API change - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: query_planner() API change
Date
Msg-id 007d01ce91b0$c9736e60$5c5a4b20$@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: query_planner() API change  (Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I agree with the idea,but am trying to understand why adding understanding of
> resjunk columns is a bad idea. Just for understanding purpose, could you
please
> elaborate a bit on it?

Although I may not have understood your question correctly, I think it is good
to see

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/14993.1354552292@sss.pgh.pa.us

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: FOR UPDATE/SHARE incompatibility with GROUP BY, DISTINCT, HAVING and window functions
Next
From: "Etsuro Fujita"
Date:
Subject: Re: query_planner() API change