On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 3:25 AM Josh Berkus
> > I should think that doing this requires heading back towards there
> > being a single unique configuration stream, and over the course of
> > several versions, deprecating the INCLUDE directive.
>
> Oh, maybe I should take a closer look at Amit's proposal then. I
> thought we planned to make use of the INCLUDE facility for SET
> PERSISTENT, including supporting include-if-exists. Possibly what he's
> proposing and what I thought our last consensus were are highly
> divergent.
Currently INCLUDE is used for including postgresql.conf.auto in postgresql.conf by default.
Can you please let me know what is the expectation?
Instead of INCLUDE,
1. include-if-exists can be used.
2. In code first read .auto file then .conf and override the values read from .auto by values from .conf.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
