Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Review of "pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog to use non-blocking socket communication", was: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hari Babu
Subject Re: Review of "pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog to use non-blocking socket communication", was: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown
Date
Msg-id 007001cdee1e$36a84780$a3f8d680$@kommi@huawei.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review of "pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog to use non-blocking socket communication", was: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown  (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On January 07, 2013 7:53 PM Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>Since my other patch against pg_basebackup is now committed,
>this patch doesn't apply cleanly, patch rejects 2 hunks.
>The fixed up patch is attached.

Patch is verified. Thanks for rebasing the patch. 

Regards,
Hari babu.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: I s this a bug of spgist index in a heavy write condition?