RE: JDBC Performance - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject RE: JDBC Performance
Date
Msg-id 006d01c11f61$edbdc410$8201a8c0@inspiron
Whole thread Raw
In response to JDBC Performance  (<mike@mwcs.mb.ca>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Doesn't sound normal! Can you post the schema for the table you are
updating

 pg_dump -s -t tablename dbname

One thing you can try if you are doing bulk updates is to drop the index
before the update, and create it again afterwards

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of mike@mwcs.mb.ca
Sent: July 31, 2001 4:01 PM
To: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
Subject: [JDBC] JDBC Performance



I am having some performance problems with postgresql and JDBC when it
comes to updates.  If I try and update a record it seems to be taking
1.7 seconds for 100 records or 14 seconds for 500 records.  An insert is
only taking between 3-5 ms/record.  Performance on the updates continue
to decrease until I vacuum analyze the database again.  Is this normal?

Mike



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)



pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dav Coleman
Date:
Subject: BIGINT vs Java's long
Next
From: Rene Pijlman
Date:
Subject: Re: cast in JDBC update