Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Date
Msg-id 006801c2c95c$15a208b0$1a01000a@rduadunstan2
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Copeland" <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>
> I'm confused as to whether you are being sarcastic or truly seem to
> think there is a distinction here.  Simple question, does MySQL require
> the cygwin dll's (or statically linked to) to run?
>
> If the answer is yes, then there is little question that they are as
> "emulated" as is the current PostgreSQL/Win32 effort.
>
> Care to expand on exactly what you believe the distinction is?  ...or
> did I miss the humor boat?  :(

I just installed it (their latest gama), to see what was there (and
uninstalled it straight away ;-). There was a cygwinb19.dll (I think that's
what it was called) installed.

In any case, if we are talking about "industrial strength", is this the
comparison we should be using? ;-)

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kurt Roeckx
Date:
Subject: Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
Next
From: Greg Copeland
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd website behavior...