Re: [GENERAL] RE: ODBC question on R+w and +r only. solved - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David Hartwig
Subject Re: [GENERAL] RE: ODBC question on R+w and +r only. solved
Date
Msg-id 006101be456b$730b7320$c37dc497@daveh
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-general
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Chalmers <robert@chalmers.com.au>
To: psql-general <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 8:51 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] RE: ODBC question on R+w and +r only. solved


>Hmmm. Just gave all permisions to user, and created a NEW table database in
>Access, and it imported the new permissions.
>
>It seems that Access imports the permissions, and then doesn't let you
chang
>them, even when they have been changed in the pgsql system.
>
>not a bad idea I usppose.
>
>Now to work out the correct permissions that the ODBC driver should run
under.
>I notice there is  [x]Read Only field in the config... should it be on/offf
and
>what are the ramifications of that side of it?
>

The next build of the driver will be more permissive in its defaults.
These conservitive settings go back to the days when ODBC updates were a
flip of a coin.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dan Warren
Date:
Subject: Newbie interface question
Next
From: David Giffin
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Multiple Postgres Instances