Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sander Steffann
Subject Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date
Msg-id 005f01c23d28$76e26590$8e01a8c0@OFFICE
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

> Here's the multi-user test summary. Very little difference. The details
> of the OSDB output are attached.
>
> NAMEDATALEN = 32, FUNC_MAX_ARGS = 32
> "Multi-User Test"       3403.84 seconds (0:56:43.84)
>
> NAMEDATALEN = 128, FUNC_MAX_ARGS = 32
> "Multi-User Test"       3412.18 seconds (0:56:52.18)

Seeing these numbers, I would definitely vote for standards-compliance with
NAMEDATALEN = 128. 8.34 seconds more on 3400 seconds is just a 0.25%
increase.

Sander.





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Amancio Hasty, Jr"
Date:
Subject: tsearch -- regular expressions?
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: apply patch for contrib/intarray (CVS)