Why are selects so slow on large tables, even when indexed? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Robert Wille
Subject Why are selects so slow on large tables, even when indexed?
Date
Msg-id 005d01c1d51c$8dc89d20$0864a8c0@zucchini
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Why are selects so slow on large tables, even when
List pgsql-general
To test PostgreSQL's scalability, I created a table with approximately 76M rows. The table had four columns: a bigint, a varchar(32), another bigint and a varchar(80). The first three columns were filled with values, the fourth was left null. After populating the table, I created an index on the first column (a non-unique index, as the column contains duplicate values) and then VACUUMed. Select statements involving only the indexed column are pathetically slow (tens of minutes). Some examples:
 
select count(*) from a where id < 0; /* returns 0 rows */
select * from a where id=5;    /* returns a handful of rows */
 
76M rows is a lot, but it shouldn't be that bad when id is indexed.
 
Attached are two scripts. One creates the table, the other populates it. I typed "create index index_a on a(id)" and "vacuum" by hand. I see this behavior both on Windows and RedHat Linux using PostgreSQL version 7.1.3 in both cases. Any idea why the performance is so poor? Can this be corrected by tuning?
 

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: data sets
Next
From: "David Stanaway"
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] resetting sequence