Re: pg_avd - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: pg_avd
Date
Msg-id 005c01c2d728$56772df0$6500a8c0@fhp.internal
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_avd  ("Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net>)
List pgsql-patches
> - separating the logic for ANALYZE and VACUUM seems like a good idea,
> IMHO. For example, INSERT doesn't create any dead tuples, so it
> shouldn't effect the need to VACUUM in any way -- but enough INSERTs

You mean "affect" :)  Sorry - just a grammar nazi :)

> As far as where this belongs, I vote against it going into bin/. It
> isn't polished enough, either in concept or in implementation, to
> deserve that kind of endorsement. But I think putting it into contrib/
> for the next release would be a good idea: if people like it, we can
> take a look at seeing what other features / fine-tuning it needs to
> warrant being part of the official package.

True - I change my vote to /contrib :)

Chris



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_avd
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-colliding auto generated names