Re: The problem is related to concurrent resquests - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Hoai Nam
Subject Re: The problem is related to concurrent resquests
Date
Msg-id 005301d1b5d4$e2434a50$a6c9def0$@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The problem is related to concurrent resquests  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
List pgsql-admin
Many thank you, Mr.Laurenz

This is useful for me. I will apply this to my DB.

Best regards
Nam
-----Original Message-----
From: Albe Laurenz [mailto:laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at]
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 5:32 PM
To: 'Nguyen Hoai Nam *EXTERN*'
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [ADMIN] The problem is related to concurrent resquests

Please keep the list posted!

Nguyen Hoai Nam wrote:
> Step1: I would to create "network" table with three columns including
> id, network_id, subnet. It's like below:
>
> +--------------------+---------------+
> |  id    |network_id |  subnet       |
> +------------------------------------+
> |   1    |     aa    |192.168.1.0/24 |
> |        |           |               |
> |        |           |               |
> +--------+-----------+---------------+
>
> This table have condition: If a new record with overlap subnet and
> same value's network_id then DB will not allow inster to DB
>
> For example:
>
> Request1: test=> INSERT INTO network VALUES (2, aa,'192.168.1.0/24');
> The result is that DB doesn't allow to insert to DB. Becase it violate
> overlap CIDR and same value's network_id
>
> Request2: test=> INSERT INTO network VALUES (3, bb,'192.168.1.0/24');
> The result is that DB ALLOW to insert to DB. Because this reqest has
> network_id = bb, this value is different with existing value (aa)

This is getting more difficult, but you can *still* do it with an exclusion constraint in PostgreSQL. You need to
installan extension with a GiST operator class for varchar: 

test=# CREATE EXTENSION btree_gist;

Then you can do the following:

   CREATE TABLE network (
      id integer PRIMARY KEY,
      network_id varchar(20) NOT NULL,
      subnet cidr NOT NULL
   );

   ALTER TABLE network
      ADD CONSTRAINT network_subnet_excl
         EXCLUDE USING gist (
            network_id gist_text_ops WITH =,
            subnet inet_ops WITH &&
         );

Then you get:

test=> INSERT INTO network VALUES (1, 'aa','192.168.1.0/24'); INSERT 0 1

test=> INSERT INTO network VALUES (2, 'aa', '192.168.1.0/24');
ERROR:  conflicting key value violates exclusion constraint "network_subnet_excl"
DETAIL:  Key (network_id, subnet)=(aa, 192.168.1.0/24) conflicts with existing key (network_id, subnet)=(aa,
192.168.1.0/24).

test=> INSERT INTO network VALUES (3, 'bb', '192.168.1.0/24'); INSERT 0 1


As Kevin said, using SERIALIZABLE transactions is an alternative, but a constraint is probably better.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Scott Whitney
Date:
Subject: Re: PITR Setup Using Hot StandBy
Next
From: "Vicky Soni - Quipment India"
Date:
Subject: Re: PITR Setup Using Hot StandBy