Oliver Jowett wrote:
> I'm actually tempted to drop the pooling DataSource implementations
> altogther. Does anyone on the list actually use these? I think the
> more common approach is for a higher layer to use our
> ConnectionPoolDataSource implementation (or plain DataSource, even)
> plus their own pooling logic..
I certainly do use Jdbc3PoolingDataSource, and would hate to see it go away.
--
www.designacourse.com
The Easiest Way to Train Anyone... Anywhere.
Chris Smith - Lead Software Developer/Technical Trainer
MindIQ Corporation
