"Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > We need to think about whether this bug is serious enough to justify a
> > quick 7.3.5 release. I'm leaning to the idea that it is not, because
> > if it were, we'd have heard about it from the field before now. In
> > pre-7.4 code there is only one instant in the lifespan of an index where
> > the bug could occur, and then only if the index is created empty.
>
> Agreed, I don't think 7.3.5 is warranted, but it would have been nice to
> get this in 7.3.4. Let's keep our eyes open for maybe a 7.3.5 later.
7.3.4 is already out, I agree that do a 7.3.5 build is not necessary.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
