Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sander Steffann
Subject Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am
Date
Msg-id 004a01c22476$8ffeb350$64c8a8c0@balefire10ww
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should next release by 8.0 (Was: Re: [GENERAL] I am  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi!

> I've always thought of our release numbering as having "themes". The 6.x
> series took Postgres from interesting but buggy to a solid system, with
> a clear path to additional capabilities. The 7.x series fleshes out SQL
> standards compliance and rationalizes the O-R features, as well as adds
> to robustness and speed with WAL etc. And the 8.x series would enable
> Postgres to extend to distributed systems etc.

This sounds very good to me. I get the feeling sometimes that software
projects just increase the major version number to 'sound interesting'. I
don't think that PostgreSQL needs that anymore. A modest numbering policy
might even give it a 'stable' feeling...

Sander.







pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: CREATE CONVERSION
Next
From: Patrick Macdonald
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues Outstanding for Point In Time Recovery (PITR)