Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Guoping Zhang
Subject Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql
Date
Msg-id 004301c66a83$234bd470$74304c93@eddy
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql  ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi, Guillaume,

Thanks for the reply.

I am using wal_sync_methods be open_datasync, which appear much faster than
'fdatasync'.

Regards,
Guoping

-----Original Message-----
From: Guillaume Smet [mailto:guillaume.smet@gmail.com]
Sent: 2006Äê4ÔÂ27ÈÕ 19:26
To: guoping.zhang@nec.com.au
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Guoping Zhang (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting
fsync OFF for postgresql


Guoping,

On 4/27/06, Guoping Zhang <guoping.zhang@nec.com.au> wrote:
> We have to looking at setting fsync OFF option for performance reason,

Did you try the other wal sync methods (fdatasync in particular)? I
saw a few posts lately explaining how changing sync method can affect
performances in specific cases.

--
Guillaume


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync
Next
From: "Guoping Zhang"
Date:
Subject: Re: how unsafe (or worst scenarios) when setting fsync OFF for postgresql