The trouble is, the update's running at the moment - it's
actually a cursor with the updtae running for each selected row
in the cursor. If it's a case of running it again, I'll put a
commit every 'n' in there so that we see things. What I need to
be able to gauge is what has happened in the procedure so far.
Alternatively, if I could force it to abort, but commit what
it's done so far externally, then that would be fine too.
----- Original Message -----
From: <mallah@trade-india.com>
To: <amarden@usa.net>
Cc: <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>; <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Long update progress
>
> create a sequence and somehow involve it in a dummy manner in
the update...
>
> do a select current_val('sequence') to see how far updates
have gone...
>
> can we see the update stmt?
>
> regds
> mallah.
>
>
> > We have an database batch update process running. It runs
normally and
> > takes around 6 hours. This is dealing with a much larger
data set after
> > an error correction. It's been running for 6 days now and
people are
> > getting twitchy that it might not finish. Is there any way
(accepting
> > that more preparation would, in retrospect, have been
better) to tell
> > how far we're got. This iterates round a cursor and updates
individual
> > rows. The trouble is it commits once at the end.
> >
> > The ideal would be to find a way of doing a dirty read
against the
> > table that is bing updated. Then we'd know how many rows had
been
> > processed.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you
checked our
> > extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Get your free web based email at trade-india.com.
> "India's Leading B2B eMarketplace.!"
> http://www.trade-india.com/
>
>
