> I'd write it off as broken code in ADO, and program around it by not
> using column names that require quoting. Ugly answer, but it's not
> clear that you have an alternative (short of waiting for an ADO fix).
I just don't fancy modifying all those hundreds of pages of code... And it
works with SQL Server,
so that would have to be broken in a compatible fashion!
> I don't like the idea of changing what SQLColAttributes returns ...
> that seems certain to break other applications.
That was, my guess too.
> But first, a wild stab in the dark --- what happens if you write
> RS("""child beds""") = 33
> ie provide the quotes at the application level?
Ah. Well. The recordset is a "collection" (like an associative array) whose
contents is created by ADO from the field names of the most-recently
executed query - so """child beds""" would be a non-existent member of the
collection...
Tim
