Hi Dave,
I have tried the example you gave below and it does not show the problem.
Further investigation has shown that the duplicate entries are only occurring on functions that return a data type named citext.
Data type citext is my own installed data type... You might remember this data type from previous bugs that I reported in the early stages of development of pgAdmin III - it turned out that the problems were with PostgreSQL 7.3.x and not pgAdmin III.
Currently I am using PostgreSQL 7.4.2 so this shouldn't be a related bug - but then I'm not really qualified to say that for certain...
Not sure what else I can do to pin point things any further...
Regards
Donald Fraser
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 9:33 AM
Subject: RE: [pgadmin-support] duplicated Index entries
Hi Donald,
Sorry for the delay in replying.
I've created the following objects using the latest CVS version of pgAdmin and see no duplicates - would you mind trying the same on your system please?
CREATE TABLE foo
(
id serial NOT NULL,
data varchar(32)
) WITHOUT OIDS;
CREATE INDEX foo_idx
ON foo
USING btree
(ascii(data::text));
CREATE INDEX foo_idx2
ON foo
USING btree
(ascii(data::text))
WHERE id > 1;
Regards, Dave.
Some more information to help solve this sneaky little bug!
The duplicated indexes are only on indexes that use a function!
For example:
CREATE INDEX tbl_cmpy_notumbrella_key
ON tbl_cmpy
USING btree
(get_cmpyname(s_umbname, s_name))
WHERE b_isumbrella IS NOT TRUE AND d_deceased IS NULL;
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 5:30 PM
Subject: [pgadmin-support] duplicated Index entries
pgAdmin III version 1.0.2
On certain tables, under the Indexes tree view I am getting duplicated index entries but not on all entries.
For example I have a table that has 19 indexes yet the tree view shows 25 - hence it has duplicated 6 entries.
To prove that they were in fact duplicated:
a) each duplicated index has exactly the same details including the oid.
b) I deleted one of the duplicated entries and then did a refresh - the second entry was also removed.
Regards
Donald Fraser.
