Re: WIP patch for LATERAL subqueries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Amit Kapila |
---|---|
Subject | Re: WIP patch for LATERAL subqueries |
Date | |
Msg-id | 003701cd73df$165f7bb0$431e7310$@kapila@huawei.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | WIP patch for LATERAL subqueries (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 3:28 AM To: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org Subject: [HACKERS] WIP patch for LATERAL subqueries > I've been idly amusing myself by trying to hack up support for SQL-standard LATERAL subqueries. I've got something > that turns over, more or less: > regression=# select * from int4_tbl a, lateral (select unique1,unique2 from tenk1 b where a.f1 = unique1) x; > f1 | unique1 | unique2 > ----+---------+--------- > 0 | 0 | 9998 > (1 row) > regression=# explain select * from int4_tbl a, lateral (select unique1,unique2 from tenk1 b where a.f1 = unique1) x; > QUERY PLAN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- > Nested Loop (cost=0.00..42.55 rows=5 width=12) > -> Seq Scan on int4_tbl a (cost=0.00..1.05 rows=5 width=4) > -> Index Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 b (cost=0.00..8.28 rows=1 width=8) > Index Cond: (a.f1 = unique1) > (4 rows) > but there's a good deal of work left to do, some of which could use some discussion. > Feature/semantics issues: > Currently the patch only implements the syntax called out in the standard, namely that you can put LATERAL in front of > a <derived table>, which is to say a parenthesized sub-SELECT in FROM. It strikes me that it might be worth allowing > LATERAL with a function-in-FROM as well. So basically > LATERAL func(args) <alias> > would be an allowed abbreviation for > LATERAL (SELECT * FROM func(args)) <alias> Since the standard doesn't have function-in-FROM, it has nothing to say > about whether this is sane or not. The argument for this is mainly that SRFs are one of the main use-cases for LATERAL > (replacing SRF-in-the- SELECT-list usages), so we might as well make it convenient. Any opinions pro or con about > that? I have checked Sybase also has similar syntax for functions by other keyword APPLY. So this should be good way to specify. > While fooling around in the planner I realized that I have no idea what outer-level aggregates mean in a LATERAL > subquery, and neither does > Postgres: > regression=# select 1 from tenk1 a, lateral (select * from int4_tbl b where f1 = max(a.unique1)) x; > ERROR: plan should not reference subplan's variable I don't see anything prohibiting this in SQL:2008, but ordinarily > this would be taken to be an outer-level aggregate, and surely that is not sensible in the LATERAL subquery. For the > moment it seems like a good idea to disallow it, though I am not sure where is a convenient place to test for such > things. Has anyone got a clue about whether this is well-defined, or is it simply an oversight in the spec? I have checked in Oracle and it gives error in such query: SQL> select * from t1, Lateral (select * from t2 where t2.c2 = max(t1.c1)); select * from t1, Lateral (select * from t2 where t2.c2 = max(t1.c1)) * ERROR at line 1: ORA-00934: group function is not allowed here With Regards, Amit Kapila.
pgsql-hackers by date: