RE: select locks table for updates - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Michel SALAIS
Subject RE: select locks table for updates
Date
Msg-id 003601d6bec3$cc0db980$64292c80$@msym.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: select locks table for updates  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-admin
I think the original question wasn't about what can be done. Any way that is how I considered it. A simple question, a
simplereply taking into account default behavior only. The point was just to say that things don't go the same
everywhere...

Michel SALAIS

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Envoyé : jeudi 19 novembre 2020 22:14
À : Michel SALAIS <msalais@msym.fr>
Cc : Yambu <hyambu@gmail.com>; Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org>
Objet : Re: select locks table for updates

On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 10:20, Michel SALAIS <msalais@msym.fr> wrote:
>
> No! Not in PostgreSQL.

In normal SELECTs, that is correct.

If you use SELECT ... FOR UPDATE then rows will be locked.

--
Simon Riggs                http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/





pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Yambu
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical replication
Next
From: Sachin Kumar
Date:
Subject: PG Admin 4.28 is crashing while viewing 10M row data