Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tim Barnard
Subject Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime
Date
Msg-id 003201c109f8$4827ecc0$a519af3f@hartcomm.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Any thoughts as to when 7.2 is targeted for release?

Tim

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "Mark" <mark@ldssingles.com>
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] vacuum and 24/7 uptime


> >
> > Is Postgresql ready for 24/7 uptime?  Our tests have shown that vacuumdb
> > requires downtime, and if one does this nightly as suggested, well, one
has
> > downtime, 40+ minutes in our case.
> >
> > My company wants to replace MS SQL Server with PostgreSQL, but we can't
> > afford downtime to do database maintenance.  Is it possible that we are
doing
> > something wrong?
> >
> > What are the plans for future versions of pgsql?  Will vacuum be
optomized or
> > otherwise enhanced to execute more quickly and/or not lock tables?
>
> We hope to eliminate that downtime in 7.2.
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: GH
Date:
Subject: Re: Read-only mode
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: trigger on DELETE