Re: Win32 users? - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Bob Pawley |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Win32 users? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 003101c57a78$d1a0aec0$ac1d4318@OWNER Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Win32 users? (Joe <svn@freedomcircle.net>) |
Responses |
Re: Win32 users?
Re: Win32 users? |
List | pgsql-general |
I'll date myself so you all may know from where I am coming. My first lesson in binary math took place in a classroom in 1958. Since then I have witnessed a lot that has since swept under the bridge. This thread reminds me of the discussion that surrounded the complexity of using the first spreadsheets (the precursor to today's Databases) that, at the time, could best be done by Wang. In the 80s Wang built an empire around their computers holding their own spreadsheet software. The system was complex and required specially trained operators in order to accomplish even the most basic of tasks. Then along came Windows. Wang collapsed. All of those specially trained operators were forced to find other employment. This major dislocation to peoples lives and livelihood was an overnight phenomenon. In my 47 years of being somewhat aligned to the software industry this story was repeated over and over again. There is a lesson to be learned from the Wang experience. People want tools to do tasks. They do not want to spend their own time (or their own money to hire others) to build, design, repair or change the tools that they need just in order to accomplish their own work - the work they know best and from which they make a living. A good tool - a perfect tool - is like a hammer. Its use is immediately known and it can be deployed quickly, accurately and with little or no specialized training. So I caution all to not make light of newbies who are searching for good tools (not even perfect tools - yet) to do the work that needs doing. The world will not sit by and continue to pay for Wang operators. Bob Pawley Big Time Newbie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas" <maps.on@gmx.net> To: "Joe" <svn@freedomcircle.net> Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 9:16 AM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Win32 users? > Joe schrieb: > >> What I am surprised is that this is (apparently) not discussed in the >> manual or the FAQ. The only indirect reference I found is in section >> 14.6.2 where it states --in a Unix context-- that "you should add [the >> PostgreSQL bin directory] into your PATH". > > Well, perhaps because the windows platform is relatively recent addition > to the Postgres habitat? > On the other hand I'd guess, that people who NEED that detailed > handholding would not bother to install a full blown SQL server or at > least would prefer to play with PGAdmin3. > >> The lack of such a reference gives me the impression that, at this time, >> native Win32 users are technically knowledgeable, because a real newbie >> may not figure out how to address the "unrecognized command" createdb >> problem. > > He/she would be a computer newbie then? > >> A related issue that I thought would be mentioned in the manuals/FAQ is >> where to add the bin directory in the PATH. The 14.6.2 section, only by >> example, implies it should be prepended to the PATH. However, you >> suggest it should be appended. I know of one other database that has a >> 'createdb' command so if I were to append it, it would still not find the >> PostgreSQL version. > > ... and if I had a card-game that happens to be called "createdb" ... > I'd allways append because this wouldn't unrecognized breake any software > that was there before. > I guess one can't naively manipulate crucial system info as PATH without > any basic knowledge what could be affected. > While I generally would append it to PATH, I'd still put it before the > CygWin-Bin if both systems are installed. ;) > > Postgres' doc could mention this, too. > > Btw. if you have 2 DBMS with a createdb command then you simply can't use > a global PATH. > Then you have to create 2 batch commands that call CMD and set the path > just for this cmd-session. > Someone who likes to run 2 DBMS parallely should figure this out, too. > >> This again may indicate the tech-savvy expected of PostgreSQL users. > > Well, yes ... ;) > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
pgsql-general by date: