Re: Size for vacuum_mem - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Nicolai Tufar
Subject Re: Size for vacuum_mem
Date
Msg-id 002c01c29d65$2933e600$8016a8c0@apb.com.tr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Size for vacuum_mem  ("David Blood" <david@matraex.com>)
List pgsql-general
> "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> On the other hand, I have watched people lazy-vacuum production
> databases in 7.2.* and not seen any visible hit on system load
> (as far as top or vmstat could show, anyway).

From my experience lazy-vacuum never strains system load with
modern processors. It is defenitely IO-bound.

regards,
Nic


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Fernando Papa"
Date:
Subject: Table functions say "no destination for result data."
Next
From: Myk Melez
Date:
Subject: publicly available PostGreSQL server?