unsuscribe mailing list - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From ingrim
Subject unsuscribe mailing list
Date
Msg-id 002601c39197$ac832170$7d64a8c0@ingridma
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL  (Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>)
List pgsql-performance

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Vivek Khera
Sent: Viernes, 10 de Octubre de 2003 03:14 p.m.
To: Josh Berkus
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] go for a script! / ex: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

>>>>> "JB" == Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:

JB> Vivek,
NB> shared_buffers = 1/16th of total memory
NB> effective_cache_size = 80% of the supposed kernel cache.
>>
>> Please take into account the blocksize compiled into PG, too...

JB> We can;t change the blocksize in a script that only does the .conf
JB> file.  Or are you suggesting something else?


when you compute optimal shared buffers and effective cache size,
these are in terms of blocksize.  so if I have 16k block size, you
can't compute based on default 8k blocksize.  at worst, it would have
to be a parameter you pass to the tuning script.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Vivek Khera
Date:
Subject: Re: further testing on IDE drives
Next
From: Seum-Lim Gan
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance, vacuum and reclaiming space, fsm