I'm sorry Tom, you are right.=20
=20
Atentamente,
Soluciones Integrales GIS C.A (SIGIS)
Christian Gonzalez
christian.gonzalez@sigis.com.ve
=20
-----Mensaje original-----
De: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org]
En nombre de Tom Lane
Enviado el: Mi=E9rcoles, 18 de Abril de 2007 01:24 p.m.
Para: Christian Gonzalez
CC: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Asunto: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3236: Partitioning has problem with timestamp and
timestamptz data type
"Christian Gonzalez" <christian.gonzalez@sigis.com.ve> writes:
> When you use timestamp and timestamptz data type for partitioning=20
> implementation, your postgresql partitioning implementation doesen't=20
> work fine when you make a SELECT using this columns type.
Your example is a bit silly, since you created a table partitioned on
logdate, then added two unrelated columns and expected the system to assume
the table was partitioned on those. I suppose this is a mistake in the
example, but it's not clear what the real complaint is.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner en busca de virus y otros
contenidos peligrosos, y se considera que est=E1 limpio.
--=20
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que est=E1 limpio.
