Hi Karsten,
> You may be mistaking the community version for any of the commercially
supported offerings ?
It is possible. Please fill in the figures.
What I am suggesting is that even for community version there should be a
charge.
But as I mentioned it is not just prices.
May be I wasn't very clear the most important factor is the business
structure then quality of products and marketing together with pricing.
As a further example consider how a very small company like ARM beat giants
like Intel and Samsung in the mobile phone industry.
It is their business model that is not profitable for Intel and Samsung to
emulate.
*Of course they have a great products. Equally importantly their business
model makes it realistic and profitable for other
companies to use their services. *
I am only providing some food for thought. For me we can all learn from
other people's successes and failures.
I for one think everyone on the team have done a great job bringing
postgresql to this stage.
Good luck
Farjad Farid
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Karsten Hilbert
Sent: 06 January 2016 11:32
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Code of Conduct: Is it time?
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:22:17AM -0000, FarjadFarid(ChkNet) wrote:
> I am not in favour of massive price structures but that there should
> be $100-$200 costs for smallest version. Times several million
> products. This may allow postgresql to reduce its prices on its the
> top of the range products.
You may be mistaking the community version for any of the commercially
supported offerings ?
Regards,
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
