Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sander Steffann
Subject Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
Date
Msg-id 001f01c5dc87$e81a2390$64c8a8c0@balefirehome
Whole thread Raw
In response to FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
List pgsql-hackers
> You can have foreign keys between temp tables, just not between temp and
> permanent tables.  The latter case is either fairly silly, or
> technically hard, depending on which direction you have in mind.

A temp table referencing a permanent table wouldn't be very silly IMHO...
Sander.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.1 Release Candidate 1 Coming ...
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?