Re: Database synchronization - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Jyoti Seth
Subject Re: Database synchronization
Date
Msg-id 001e01c7cf40$85e7b540$91b71fc0$@com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Database synchronization  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Responses Re: Database synchronization
List pgsql-sql
Thanks a lot for your suggestion. It will help me in taking the decision.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Huxton [mailto:dev@archonet.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 6:10 PM
To: Jyoti Seth
Cc: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Database synchronization

Jyoti Seth wrote:
> My master database contains prices of some products that vary after few
> hours and many other details that are also reqd in Db2 which doesn't
change
> that frequently. My slave database contains the details of queries sent by
> the customers.
> These queries are to find the price of the product and other details.
(Some
> part of the info reqd from Db1 varies frequently where some information is
a
> kind of master data that doesn't vary frequently).
> 
> So should I use all the ways i.e #2 or #3 to get price info and #1 (slony)
> for other details or there is some other better option

If you can live with a time-lag measured in seconds, then slony will 
work just fine. If you can't then you'll want dblink.

One other thing you might consider - if you attach "valid_from" time to 
each price then you can put them in place in advance, and make sure they 
are replicated before needed.

--   Richard Huxton  Archonet Ltd



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Paul Lambert
Date:
Subject: Re: Assistance with a trigger
Next
From: Bryce Nesbitt
Date:
Subject: Re: The nested view from hell - Restricting a subquerry