Hi Tom,
> "Sander Steffann" <s.steffann@computel.nl> writes:
> > From: "Harald Fuchs" <hf0217x@protecting.net>
> >> Forget inet. Check out http://pgfoundry.org/projects/ip4r/ and be
> happy.
>
> > I would be happy if it would support IPv6 :-) Are there plans to
> > make ip6r or something like that?
>
> What's the point? You might as well use the regular inet type if you
> need to handle ipv6.
Well, the OP said to forget about inet, and I like the ip4r range type. I
hoped there was something better/nicer/shinier :-)
Thanks,
Sander
