Re: [HACKERS] Re: Re: re : PHP and persistent connections - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Mitch Vincent
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: Re: re : PHP and persistent connections
Date
Msg-id 001101c0577f$4b7e5ed0$0200000a@windows
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: re : PHP and persistent connections  (Paul McGarry <PaulM@opentec.com.au>)
List pgsql-novice
I'm sure that this, if true, could certainly be the source of the problems
I've seen... I can't comment on if PHP is completely threadsafe, I know that
some of the modules (for lack of a better word) aren't, possible the ClibPDF
library I'm using. I'll check into it.

Thanks!

-Mitch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Baccus" <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
To: "Mitch Vincent" <mitch@venux.net>; "PostgreSQL Hackers List"
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: <pgsql-novice@postgresql.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [NOVICE] Re: re : PHP and persistent connections


> At 10:00 PM 11/25/00 -0800, Mitch Vincent wrote:
> >    I've tried quite a bit to use persistent connections with PHP (for
over
> >a year) and always the scripts that I try to use them with behave
crazy...
> >The last time I tried there were problems all over the place with PHP,
> >variables getting overwritten, certain functions just totally breaking
> >(date() to name one) and so on.. I know I'm not being specific but my
point
> >is that I think there are some other outstanding PHP issues that play
into
> >this problem as the behavior that I've seen isn't directly related to
> >PostgreSQL but only happens when I use persistent connections..
>
> I've heard rumors that PHP isn't thoroughly threadsafe, could this be a
> source of your problems?
>
>
>
>
> - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
>   Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
>   Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
>   http://donb.photo.net.
>


pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Dmitri Touretsky
Date:
Subject: Re[2]: Couple simple(?) questions...
Next
From: Andrew McMillan
Date:
Subject: Re: Skipping numbers in a sequence.