Re: Why the ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "master_pkey" is raised? - Is this a Bug? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ashish Karalkar
Subject Re: Why the ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "master_pkey" is raised? - Is this a Bug?
Date
Msg-id 000f01c7fe7f$8cd68840$170211ac@LIONKING.COM
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why the ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "master_pkey" is raised? - Is this a Bug?  ("Anoo Sivadasan Pillai" <aspillai@in.rm.com>)
List pgsql-general
As per as I think this is not bug,
 
in first case
 
when u update the first row
In first case:
 
M1= 1+1 =2  conflict with the second row.
 
in second case:
 
M1=3+1=4 no conflict with second row
 
I hope this will help.
With reagrds
Ashish
 
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 12:50 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] Why the ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "master_pkey" is raised? - Is this a Bug?

I am using "PostgreSQL 8.2.4 on i686-pc-mingw32, compiled by GCC gcc.exe (GCC) 3.4.2 (mingw-special)" on Windows 2003 server

While I am trying to update a prmary key It is failing with the  following  message “ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "master_pkey" “

Can anybody explain why this happens so?  Sending the script that I tried.

 

CREATE TABLE master ( m1 INT primary key , m2 VARCHAR(100)) ;

INSERT  INTO master VALUES  ( 1, 'm1' ) ;

INSERT  INTO master VALUES  ( 2, 'm2' ) ;

UPDATE  master SET m1 = m1 + 1;

 

Update fails with the message - ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "master_pkey"

 

If I insert data in the reverse order it is making no problem. Is this a Bug ?

I tried ,

 

TRUNCATE TABLE master;

INSERT  INTO master VALUES  ( 3, 'm3' ) ;

INSERT  INTO master VALUES  ( 2, 'm2' ) ;

UPDATE master SET m1 = m1 + 1;

It works perfectly.

 

 

Anoo S

 

Visit our Website at www.rmesi.co.in

This message is confidential. You should not copy it or disclose its contents to anyone. You may use and apply the information for the intended purpose only. Internet communications are not secure; therefore, RMESI does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are those of the author only and not of RMESI. If this email has come to you in error, please delete it, along with any attachments. Please note that RMESI may intercept incoming and outgoing email communications.

Freedom of Information Act 2000
This email and any attachments may contain confidential information belonging to RMESI. Where the email and any attachments do contain information of a confidential nature, including without limitation information relating to trade secrets, special terms or prices these shall be deemed for the purpose of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 as information provided in confidence by RMESI and the disclosure of which would be prejudicial to RMESI's commercial interests.

This email has been scanned for viruses by Trend ScanMail.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Yinan Li"
Date:
Subject: how to get the total statistics info and query time for many queries
Next
From: Mark Morgan Lloyd
Date:
Subject: Best practice for specifying an interval